Memory Commons

What humanity has attempted

Every serious attempt to carry human knowledge across deep time, what each chose to say, and what physics says about how long it lasts. Entries marked ✓ are adversarially verified in our research rounds — every claim carries its source, and refuted claims are published. Unmarked entries are documented from primary and secondary sources, verification pending.

The attempts

ProjectYearMedium · placeSelectionFate
Pioneer plaques1972–73gold-anodized aluminum · escape trajectorytwo designers, weeksleaving the solar system
LAGEOS-1 plaque1976steel · ~5,900 km orbit (~8.4 Myr stable)Sagan, single messagein orbit, by design until re-entry ~8 Myr from now
Voyager Golden Records1977gold-plated copper · escape trajectorysmall committee (Sagan)interstellar; the founding template and the founding critique — see MIAB ✓
KEO1994–satellite time capsule · never launchedopen public messagesthree decades of delays; the single-artifact failure mode
Rosetta Disk ✓2008microetched nickel, ~13,000 analog pages, 1,500+ languages · Earth (+ 2004 ESA comet copy)curated (Long Now)readable with optical magnification alone — no format dependency; the decodability gold standard
Memory of Mankind ✓2012–ceramic tablets (5 M chars each) · Hallstatt salt mine, self-sealing ~2 cm/yropen retail: €60–350 per tablet, ceramic map-token to every buyerongoing; the one verified self-funding model
EchoStar XVI, “The Last Pictures” ✓2012nano-etched silicon in gold-plated jacket · GEO → graveyard orbitone artist, 100 photographsin orbit; carries a self-describing primer — hydrogen-line time unit, 13-pulsar epoch (~0.02-day accuracy)
Arch Mission: Tesla Roadster20185D quartz (Asimov trilogy) · heliocentric escapesymbolicorbiting the Sun
Arch Mission: Lunar Library ✓201925 nickel discs, 40 µm each, 100 g · Beresheet lander, Mooncurated compilationcrashed; “survived intact” is the foundation's own reading of LRO imagery — NASA never confirmed
GitHub Arctic Code Vault ✓202021 TB on 186 reels of piqlFilm · Svalbard minerule-based: every qualifying repo, no curationdeposited; the selection-method lesson
Astrobotic Peregrine payloads2024multiple memorial/archive payloads · intended for the Mooncommercial ridesharepropulsion failure; burned on re-entry — the delivery-risk lesson
Microsoft Project Silica ✓2016–2026fused-silica platters, 7 TB raw (2–5 TB demonstrated)research phase ended Feb 2026, no product; media R&D, not an archive
“Message in a Bottle” proposal ✓2023two-tier design: analog scroll + digital layer, each layer the key to the nextpeer-reviewed critique of Voyager's ethnocentrismunflown; the content-architecture template
Celestis · LifeShipongoingDNA capsules, names, messages · orbital & lunar ridesharespay-to-include retailoperating; proof that individuals pay for permanence

What actually survives

A catastrophe does not fling satellites to safety — whatever is already in a stable place simply stays. So the design question is: which places are already safe? The verified persistence ladder:

LEOyears–decades · capped at mission +5 yr by law · excludedMEOchaotic — overlapping lunisolar resonances; no stable graveyard existsGEO / graveyardcenturies verified · deep time plausible, unprovenLunar surface~0.2 mm/Myr abrasion at cm scale — small survives longestLunar lava tubes~290 K, <1 °C swing, shieldedEscape trajectorylongestBar length is indicative persistence, not to scale. Discoverability runs the other way — the farthest artifacts are the hardest to find.
LEO decays in years and is now legally capped (FCC 5-year rule, 2022). MEO is chaotic — every attempt to define a stable Galileo graveyard failed. GEO is the longest-lived orbit with peer-reviewed evidence, but that evidence reaches ~120–1,000 years; “billions of years” traces to publicity, not literature. On the Moon, small and low-profile outlasts monumental. Caves beat surfaces. Escape trajectories last longest and are found last.

The materials

MediumDensity / capacityLongevity basisEvidence class
Nickel (Nanofiche / NanoRosetta) ✓~81,000 pages per 160 mm wafer measured; 2,000 pages/cm² claimed“thousands of years”; melting point 1,455 °Cvendor claim, no test standard cited
Ceramic (Memory of Mankind) ✓5 M chars per 20×20 cm tabletfired ceramic + self-sealing salt geologyvendor + geology
piqlFilm ✓120 GB/reel>1,000 yr claimed; ~750 yr per accelerated agingvendor, third-party aging test
5D fused silica ✓360 TB/disc projected; demos far lower“unlimited” projectedpeer-reviewed demos, projected figures
Tungsten in Si₃N₄ ✓QR-encoded planar media~1.8 eV barrier → 1 Gyr by Arrhenius modelpeer-reviewed model + accelerated aging (preprint)
Cerabyte ceramic-on-glass ✓125 GB now, 1 TB+ roadmapseed-stage roadmap targets
Synthetic DNA ✓highest theoretical densityfragile outside cold, dark storagewrite >$100k/GB (2022) — economics fail today

The lessons

Selection is the reputational risk. The one peer-reviewed critique of the Voyager Record is about content, not engineering — a small committee's ethnocentrism. The Arctic Code Vault sidestepped this with rule-based inclusion. Our design: a rule-based baseline plus a curated layer with open challenge.

Decodability must be layered. The Rosetta Disk needs only a magnifier; EchoStar XVI teaches its own time system from the hydrogen line; the MIAB design makes each tier the key to the next. Nothing digital should be the only copy of the essentials.

Redundancy beats monuments. KEO spent three decades trying to launch one perfect satellite and never flew. Arch Mission ships cheap copies at every opportunity — and even a crashed one may have survived. Peregrine burned; the answer to delivery risk is more artifacts, not better promises.

Longevity claims inflate. Every “billions of years” figure in this field is a projection or publicity. The honest statement — millions of years credibly, billions plausibly — is strong enough.

The audience sets the odds. For a stranger, finding any of these artifacts is effectively impossible. For a successor who inherits the catalog, it is trivial. That inversion iswhy this project exists.

Sources: research rounds1,2 and3, with raw verified findings (sources, votes, refuted claims) underDocuments.